The results of an internal watchdog investigation reportedly reveal that neither Housing and Urban Development Secretary Dr. Ben Carson nor his wife, Candy Carson, engaged in any wrongdoing in attempting to purchase furniture for the agency.
The Carsons made headlines last February after media outlets, including The New York Times, accused Ben Carson of trying to spend $31,000 on a dining room set for his office.
According to The Times, a whistleblower accused Candy Carson of pushing for elaborate office modifications on the government’s dime.
“The whistleblower, Helen Foster, was a career HUD employee,” NPR reported. “She filed a complaint in November  alleging she was demoted and replaced after refusing to exceed the legal $5,000 limit on redecoration.”
The Carsons have maintained ever since the controversy broke that they did nothing wrong.
And the results of a HUD Office of Inspector General report, which Fox News obtained, appear to clear them.
According to the internal watchdog, Ben Carson let his staff deal with the buying of furniture for the HUD offices, “in consultation with his wife, who provided stylistic input after the Department decided to purchase new furniture.”
“We found no evidence indicating that either Secretary or Mrs. Carson exerted improper influence on any departmental employee in connection with the procurement,” the inspector general’s report reads.
“We did not find sufficient evidence to substantiate allegations of misconduct on the part of Secretary Carson in connection with this procurement,” it says.
Do you think the Carsons did anything wrong?
17% (1 Votes)
83% (5 Votes)
According to the watchdog, it all started in mid-2017, when HUD employees began the process of obtaining new furniture for Carson’s office.
“HUD officials obligated $31,561 in departmental funds on Dec. 21, 2017 for the purchase of new dining room furniture, but ‘did not make required notification’ to the House and Senate’s appropriations committees before doing so,” according to Fox, which cited the inspector general’s report.
The watchdog is “not making any recommendations to the Department as a result of the evidence gathered in this investigation because we found no evidence of misconduct and because the Department is working to address the legal ramifications of the dining-room furniture procurement and to prevent future appropriations-law violations.”
The Carsons, for their part, have defended themselves from the start.
“Thank you to so many who have expressed concern for me and my family over the latest accusations,” the couple tweeted last year. “Rest assured that there has been no dishonesty or wrongdoing by us. All the numbers and evidence are being gathered and a full disclosure is forthcoming.”
Thank you to so many who have expressed concern for me and my family over the latest accusations. Rest assured that there has been no dishonesty or wrongdoing by us. All the numbers and evidence are being gathered and a full disclosure is forthcoming. 1/2
— Ben & Candy Carson (@RealBenCarson) March 1, 2018
Ben Carson also explained to the House Appropriations Committee last year that HUD staffers sought to buy new furniture because the existing furniture was not safe.
“People were stuck by nails, and a chair had collapsed with someone sitting in it,” he said, according to the Washington Examiner. “You know I’m not really big into decorating. If it were up to me, my office would probably look like a hospital waiting room. At any rate, I invited my wife in to come help me.”
The order for new furniture was canceled in March 2018 after the controversy erupted.
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.